Objective(s): Currently there are various methods to analyze Differential Item Functioning(DIF) and to evaluate the similarity of people's understanding of a questionnaire’s items in different subgroups, among them are the Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Model (MG-CFA) and the Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes ((MIMIC)). The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the perception of adult women and men of the rural population of Iran on Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA).
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a sample of 5675 adults from East Azarbaijan, Khorasan Razavi, Sistan and Baluchistan, Mazandaran, and Fars provinces was selected through a multi-stage cluster sampling technique. Confirmatory factor analysis and evaluation of equivalence of measurement based on gender using (MIMIC) and MG-CFA methods for the HELIA has been done using M-plus and AMOS software.
Results: The overall mean (SD) score of the HELIA was at a low level (59.64±22.85). The mean score did not show a significant difference in men and women (p=0.624). The overall mean score of the HELIA was significantly higher in people with university education, employed, and unmarried people (P<0.001). The results of the MG-CFA Model fitting indicated the presence of DIF in items 10, 22, 28, and 29, and the (MIMIC) Model fitting indicates the presence of DIF in items 1, 4, 26, and 27 of the questionnaire.
Conclusion: By highlighting gender differences in the understanding of HELIA items, our findings emphasize the need for culturally appropriate approaches to assess health literacy and develop targeted interventions to promote health literacy among rural communities in Iran.